Jim Hall Election Case – Part 2
September 13th, 2016 by Joe Burgess
When court resumed, plaintiff’s attorney Chris Burks asked Hall (who was now on the witness stand) when he became aware of the warrant for the hot check. He responded, “around a year ago.”
Another question, in the 2014 case, that Hall pleaded guilty of in May, 2016, was if he had filed appeal for the conviction. Hall replied that he had attempted to file a motion to seal the verdict, in May, but was told he had to wait 60 days.
Burks asked Hall if after he’d heard about Bolin’s pending case, he quickly went to Faulkner County, to get the case expunged. He replied, “I had sent someone, twice, to take care of it,” but they didn’t, “and I’m no longer married to her.”
Hall was then asked when the 60 day expungement time was over, from April 1, and he replied that he didn’t know. He continued to explain that he filed to seal on August 30, when he realized the time had passed.
Hall was then asked about other convictions, which wasn’t allowed to be pursued.
During discussion, Judge Laser asked Hall, “(Is) The only proof that you could add (today) is proof that should’ve been covered in the district court, back then?” which was not clearly answered.
Just before noon, the plaintiff asked for a directed verdict, which is still being discussed.
Choose another article
Newer article: Jim Hall Election Court Case – Part 1
Older article: Hall Removed from State Rep. Race for “Deception” in Hot Check Case – Part 3
This dude loves him some drama…..smh